Quotes to live by:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." -Declaration of Independence
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." -MLK, Jr.
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." -MLK, Jr.
Internet Defense League
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Monday, January 6, 2014
Save NC College Students Food - Email to Governor Pat McCrory
Governor McCrory,
I believe taxing college students meal plans is a poor decision and a reflection of the attitude that the role of Government which is to figure out more ways to abuse and tax the public. I am a senior at East Carolina University. Fortunately this does not affect because I am able to finish my degree off-campus through distance education, but I am concerned with the concept of taxing a program whose partial revenue comes from taxation itself. Many student's meal plans are funded through scholarships and grants, especially the Pell Grants, in where this is a fund developed from taxation. So in essence we are taxing a tax. Students will now have 7% less to eat each semester because they are having to be taxed to eat. Students will now increase the tax coffers at the expense of a cheeseburger, slice of pizza, or a salad many times by the end of a semester. It is a shame that politicians only look at the revenue stream instead of the real consequences of slighting a student of a meal. I am very disappointed in this legislation and your approval of it.
Kind Regards,
Paul Michael Owens
ECU Student
Person County Resident
Saturday, April 20, 2013
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Letter to Senator Hagan about Taxes and Economic Integrity
Dear Senator Hagan,
I am writing about Taxation and Economic Integrity. Taxation is probably the most unfavorable part of citizenry, but I do understand that everyone must pay their fair share if they want government to provide services. What I do not agree with is the “Cancellation of Debt” as income tax. I have been dealing with the IRS for two letters now about a company that has filed a 1099-C form that has been applied to my IRS account. I have no knowledge of this company or the debt, in which I am handling this with the IRS. The point that this brings up is the fact that this is even an available option for the IRS to make a claim on a person’s income because of a cancellation of debt. Debt is the Antithesis of Income. The income from a debt transaction is the interest and fees made off the principal of the loan or granted credit for the creditor. There is no “income” for the recipient of the loan or granted credit, because they have to pay it all back plus interest and fees. Even if we were trying to drill down to the root of the issue, the receipt gains money only of the amount that would be the principal if the loan or credit was never repaid. For example a $500 limit credit card a person ran up to the limit only gave the person $500. But, the creditor’s interest and fees can balloon this $500 amount quickly and easily as to generate income for itself. Compound the interest and fees with the selling of debt through multiple collection agencies and that $500 is now easily $2000. The final company files losses on their tax report as well as submit this $2000 as a “Cancellation of Debt” to the IRS. How is this final amount a representation of income when it does not reflect real money gained or earned? This money was not earned, it was forgiven and the debt was cancelled. Only on the IRS Publication 4681, is there any correlation to Debt being income. How can this simple inference that John cancelled $600 of debt for Mary’s $1000, that Mary suddenly had $600 as income? This is a poor observation and a misleading diagnosis. It is a false statement that is solely made true only because it appears as letters and words on a Federal Document. A cancellation of debt is not income. This is just another demonstration of the mockery that presents itself as the IRS. Rules and regulations such as this continue to reflect poorly on the Congress who are either unwilling or too inept to correct such erroneous rules and regulations that reside within the Tax Code. Most of the reason that we are in such trying economic times is because of the lack of fortitude in Congress as well as negligent laws including the allowing of the sale of debt from company to company until one company files bankruptcy or gets bailed out by the government, ie: AIG. Writing legislation is not hard; getting legislation passed is the complicated part. We should at least see attempts from our representatives making an effort to correct erroneous rules and regulations that have been molded in favor for financial entities. Financial entities have caused enough economic challenges for America at large and need to be reigned in. This will take leadership and fortitude to take on the financial sector in which most Congressional representatives cannot demonstrate. Good Luck in your future endeavors and I hope to see positive legislation coming from your office.
Kind Regards,
Paul Michael Owens
Monday, March 11, 2013
Letter to Senator Burr about Exempt Labor Rules

Senator Burr,
Thank you for your service for North Carolina. I appreciate the time that you take to speak to the public in different venues. I am writing in regards to the inconsistencies that are in the Fair Labor Standards Act specifically Section 13(a)(1), which designates an exact minimum salary an employer is allowed to make an employee an exempt employee and the exceptions put forth in this section. It specifies a minimum of $455 a week, which is less than $22,000 a year or around $11.38 an hour. In the computer section, the hourly rate is $27.63 an hour which is about $1105 a week, which equals a bit over $57,000 a year. In North Carolina being an exempt employee plays into the "Right to Work" state mantra in where an employee must complete all tasks required of the job regardless of hours required. What is lost in this low number of $455 a week is the value an employer can place on a position that otherwise should be a non-exempt position, other than the fact that the capability has been given by the Federal Labor laws to designate a position as exempt with such a low wage. The value of an being an exempt employee needs to be increased to a minimum of at least $50,000 a year or $962 a week. It would be a great change that could be offered from your office during this time of wage debate in which the President wants to increase the minimum wage to $9 an hour. This would change the ability to pay someone a minimum of $22,000 a year and potentially work them an amount of hours that could be the equivalent of less than minimum wage solely because they are an exempt employee. This would be an easy change in legislation as it only affects a few lines which a number adjustment. I look forward to hearing from you or seeing this type of legislation come from your office.
Kind Regards,
Paul Michael Owens
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Email Response to John Locke Foundation's comments on Occupy Raleigh
(John Locke -- Library of Congress)
WTVD 11 an ABC Affiliate covered the Occupy Raleigh "protest" and received some concerning comments from the John Locke Foundation representative Mr. Kokai who basically states the protesters right to free speech ends when it costs taxpayers money. Read the article here: CLICK HERE!
This is the obvious skewed government vision coming from an organization that believes in "Limited Constitutional Government".
In response to this obvious "unconstitutional" statement, I sent the following email to the JLF:
To The John Locke Foundation,
Per your Vision:
The John Locke Foundation envisions a North Carolina of responsible citizens, strong families, and successful communities committed to individual liberty and limited, constitutional government.
How does Mr. Kokai's comments to WTVD11 align with a constitutional government? His comments are supporting the imposed police state from a perspective that extra police are needed to monitor a peaceful assembly. I see no support for the peaceful assembly which is a "constitutional" right. I see no opposition to the required "permits" for peaceful assemblies, which are unconstitutional.
This demonstration of your foundation values by Mr. Kokai's statements opens the door to your true mission of further government powers separating them from its citizenry creating a form of despotism.
These types of comments coming from your organization also shows the validity of your organization because Mr. Kokai's statements are the antithesis of a constitutional government.
Government in its current state is currently an organization full of corruption and excessive spending, this is part of the problem that is being protested against.
Fulfill your vision and backtrack Mr. Kokai's comments.
Kind Regards,
Paul Michael Owens
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Equal Taxes for All
(The official White House portrait of John F. Kennedy by Aaron Shikler)
Equal Taxes for All
Author: Paul Michael Owens
A government must tax its citizens to maintain its deemed operations. Governments throughout history have deemed some sort of tax necessary. Ancient Egyptians paid taxes. Ancient Romans paid taxes. Taxes have been shown to be levied throughout the Middle Ages. Most historical taxation of the public involved no public input. These taxes were created by Kings and Emperors of various populations to fund their own ideas and projects. The United States Government started a historical trend with the formation of a government for the people and by the people. This put the control of how a government chooses its tax scheme theoretically back into the hands of the people. The United States Government currently uses a progressive taxation system on income that is based on the amount of income one earns (Tax Foundation, 2011). There are also other taxes on the individual such as the gas tax that is levied on the public that go to the government. Taxation is a way of life when an individual seeks protection and services from a government. A person has to look hard to find something that is not taxed one way or another. The difference on the multitude of variety of taxes would be where these taxes are going. If a person lives in a city, they will pay a city tax. One also pays a tax to the county if one has property. Income is taxed by most States and the Federal Government. When one purchases gas, it is also taxed by the State and the Federal Government.
In our current environment of total taxation, the United States Government has more expenditures than it has tax revenue. Sparing a short period from 1998 to 2001, the United States Government has been deficit spending, which is spending more than one earns (Government Printing Office, 2005). One hears many statements of needing revenue for the government to pay its bills. This is only a perspective of how the government should operate. Government needs to stop spending more than it brings in. Like every other American Family who lives within their means, the government should follow the same model. The required cuts would be a drastic change and would be too much for people to handle or even comprehend because of the amount of dependence America has on its government. Talking about how much money the government spends can be overwhelming, which is why it becomes a daunting subject. The figures that the budgets present with more than 9 zeros on the end can be remarkably scary. To make it easy, one simply has to cut off all the zeros and use that number as an example. For instance: the government spends 31,000 a year, while only earning 28,000 a year. This is reflective of the 2010 operational budget of the United States Government (Government Printing Office, 2005). This is also representative of how the Federal Government has been deficit spending since 1931. For only 10 years randomly placed in the 80 year history, the United States has been spending more than it has been taking in (Government Printing Office, 2005). This is where the difference between debt and deficit spending come into play. The United States of America is very close to being 15 trillion dollars in debt (US Department of Treasury, 2011). The United States is in this situation because of the 80 year history of spending more than earned revenue it receives through taxation.
The current conversation about change in tax strategy involves a lot of rhetoric about taxing the 1% top income earners more. The top 1% already pays over 50% of their income in taxes, while over 47% of individuals pay no federal taxes (National Public Radio, 2010). This is an inherent problem for a real change in strategy because the conversation has been redirected from appropriate spending of what tax revenue is available to creating more revenue so programs in place can continue. Americans have voiced in many polls that they do not want to see a tax increase. The soliloquies abound that the rich are getting richer and the gap between the rich and poor is growing is completely true. These comments have nothing to do with taxing rich people more and a fair tax strategy. The tremendous debt and overspending of the available government funds is a big problem that does have a direct relation to taxation. Even if the rich were taxed more, it would not correct the poor fiscal irresponsibility the current politicians practice. The practice of deficit spending needs to stop. The government needs to shrink its expenditures, and further decrease the tax burden on the public at large, and make an attempt to work on the ever increasing debt this country owes. The rich getting richer and gap growth has to do with the government facilitating bailouts for companies that otherwise would have gone bankrupt for shady deals that appropriately reviewed would have found as fraud. The government tax conversation should not be about generating more revenue at all. A government should not have an agenda of “generating revenue”. The government should be having a conversation about the scope of government operations and what is really needed from the government to service and protect its citizenry. A redefining tax strategy should be included in these conversations.
A tax strategy should be fair for every citizen regardless of their wealth. A government should be forced to operate within its means with the only exception of War. One must also include what taxes are being spent on when talking about taxes. What does the United States Government spend most of the tax dollars on? The largest expenditures the government has can fall in three big areas: Defense, Social Programs, and Treasury (US Department of Treasury, 2011). The largest expenditure is for Defense and Security of the nation. The second largest expenditure that the Federal Government spends the tax money on is social programs which means the government pays totally or supplemental for a citizen’s survival. The third largest area of the expenditures is a complete result of over 80 years of deficit spending. The United States Government has to continuously borrow money to pay back earlier borrowed money from an entity created by the United States Government to be a neutral entity to handle the United States Monetary Policy called the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, which is a private corporation, was created in 1913. The Federal Reserve loans the United States Government money and makes a profit in return. This subject can and has been expounded on but relevant to this topic it plays a large part in the unnecessary expenditures of the United States Government. The tax policy plays a very large role in the operations of a government. In the past the government was not allowed to spend more than it generated, other than in times of war in which these cases a war tax was implemented to pay for the unexpected expenditures. Now all the government has to do is borrow money. This directly affects taxes because it creates a base the must be paid, similar to a minimum payment on a credit card. This base is now the third largest expenditure of the United States Government. Understanding what tax money is spent on is invaluable information that helps with the discussion of what type of tax strategy should be in place.
The biggest challenge in understanding taxation the American Way, is to finally understand that the current government is looking for ways to create money so it can spend it on programs that may not be nationally necessary. To further complicate the issue, a person must be able to look past the gimmick of the Two Party System. The two party system is only there to blind the general public of the real issue at hand, which is a group of individuals whose goal is to further their own agendas which is currently not the agenda of providing the general welfare of the nation. The current overwhelming public government dependency is not a fruitful path to success of a nation. A government that taxes a small group of people overwhelmingly to support a larger group of people is an unsustainable model. These are the conversations that need to be had to correct the irresponsible fiscal policies that are currently in place. The only way to get the United States Government back in-line with true American values is to shrink its programs considerably and present a fair tax plan to the citizenry that creates an equal playing field for all regardless of wealth. This fair tax plan must include forcing the Federal Government to “Live Within its means”.
Bibliography:
Government Printing Office. (2005). Historical Tables of the United States Budget. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from Government Printing Office: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy06/pdf/hist.pdf
This document is created from an Executive Office of the President of the United States. The Office of Management and Budget provides facts and figures dating back to 1789. This document provides a very good history of the tax collection and expenditures of the Federal Government. There are many tables found which include a very heavy amount of data that help expand on points created within my paper and further prove how irresponsible the government has been spending for decades.
National Public Radio. (2010, April 04). All Things Considered - Who Pays Taxes? Not as Many as You Think. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from National Public Radio: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125997180
Robert Siegel is the host of All Things Considered. All Things Considered is a nationally syndicated show that is broadcasted by National Public Radio. On April 4th, 2010 , Mr. Siegel interviewed Mr. Roberton Williams who is a Senior Fellow at the Tax Policy Center, which is a Washington Think Tank whose mission is to review all aspects around the Federal Government's tax policy. In this interview Mr. Siegel provides some interesting facts including the amount of citizens who pay no tax. This interview provides valuable facts that pertain to many points I express.
Tax Foundation. (2011). Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from www.taxfoundation.org: http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/fed_individual_rate_history_nominal&adjusted-20110909.pdf
The Tax Foundation is a nonpartisan tax research group based in Washington, D.C. This is a document which provides tables on the tiered income tax structure of the United States back to 1937. This document provides statistical data of the rate of taxation and the yearly changes that have occurred through the reported history. This document provides me the evidence that I need to make valid points on the amount of taxes that people have to pay based on their income level.
US Department of Treasury. (2011). Debt Limit. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from US Department of Treasury: http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/Pages/debtlimit.aspx
The United States Department of Treasury provides this webpage as a reference page for information about the debt limit. This page provides specific definitions of what the debt limit includes within its scope and what is not applicable to apply to the nation's debt. This page also provides an in-depth review of the nation's debt limit and provides a large amount of documentation. This page is useful in providing definitions and data that can be used for my argument.
US Department of Treasury. (2011). FY2012 Budget in Brief. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from US Department of Treasury: http://www.treasury.gov/about/budget-performance/budget-in-brief/Documents/FY2012_BIB_Complete_508.pdf
This document created by the United States Department of Treasury contains Fiscal Year 2012's operating Budget Request. This is a 125 page document that specifies how much money is requested and the anticipated allocation of the requested money. This document helps expand the argument on how much money the Federal Government is spending. The data and statistics provided in this document is very valuable to my argument.
US Department of Treasury. (2011). The Debt to the Penny and Who owns It. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from Treasury Direct: http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
The Treasury Direct website is a portal which provides reports on many items regarding the Federal Government expenditures and obligations. This site provides a large amount of data and statistics in regards to the National Debt. It segregates how much the general public is responsible for and how much intergovernmental agencies are responsible for. The final current total tally provides a grossly large number that all should be aware of while the government continues to spending away. This site provides valuable information for my argument.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Friday, July 8, 2011
The Final NASA Space Shuttle Launch - STS-135: Atlantis
The dream will continue, yet obviously not important to this administration.
God Speed Atlantis!
God Speed Atlantis!
Sunday, July 3, 2011
Bill Clinton talks "Class Warfare" - 2011
Bill does not like the term Class Warfare. Sure, it incites the you against us type rhetoric, but is it true? Is it, we'll give you a little more so we don't have any more "Let them eat cake" incidents, or is it something else? Nevertheless, during the Clinton Administration, we never spent more than we took in. This is important because this is the only time in a long budget history this has happened. Even REGAN spent more than he took in. Bill Clinton is definitely a smart man. Watch for yourself.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Monday, April 18, 2011
Warren Buffett on Class Warfare in 2006
Photo: Warren Buffett and President Obama in the Oval Office 2010 - "I can flip that trillion and make it into ten, Barack."
In an interview with Ben Stein published November 26, 2006, Warren Buffett said the following:
“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”
I think Warren was just being an honest person. With plans of giving away 99% percent of his wealth when he passes, I believe indirectly that he is simply giving information to those who wish to pay attention, while being one of the greatest philanthropists of the modern age.
As the saying goes, the rich keep getting richer. Unfortunately the Mortgage Schemes presented to the Public by the banks is a fraud. Forcing people to pay 150-200% Interest on loans to acquire property for themselves which take a vast part of an adult lifetime to pay-off and also foreclosing on properties that have the value of the property paid, yet not the interest, is a despicable practice. Home ownership is the American Dream right? Sure, after the banks squeeze you for everything they can get, cause.... they need to make money too, right? ... and you want a loan for 30 years right? No.
Whatever happened to the Bailey Building and Loan, oh wait, that was just a fairy tale. Unfortunately the banks did take over our country back in 1913.
Our Founding Fathers made many warnings to future generations, yet no one wishes to listen at all. Thomas Jefferson made a comment that "..banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies..", and who knows if he was relaying the cold-hearted disregard to the human for a coin, rather than a passionate defense of a country that an army provides, rather than the warm rationale of George Bailey trying to save his small hometown operation during the rush of the banks.
We shall never know the true intent of words of our passed predecessors, but fortunately we have them to read and to speculate.
Warren is simply a wise businessman who worked since he was a child and made his wealth through savvy investments. If you want it, it is out there, go get it.
Ben did a great job with this article:
Click Here to Read Ben's Article about Warren in the NY Times
Friday, April 1, 2011
Bedbugs at the United Nations: A Modern World Response to Islam
Perhaps I should note that this is not me... I don't know who it is, but regardless, find error in things he says.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Monday, February 7, 2011
Letter to Congressman Brad Miller NC-13
Congressman Miller,
Congratulations on your re-election to the 13th District Representative Seat in the United States Congress. It seems as if the Republicans as a group are taking strides in the bill submission category. I prefer the government style recommendations laid out by our first President of the United States of America, George Washington, who warned against a party system saying that it would create a divide in the American population. What we see now is the result of this process. The first two Bills presented in the House have been: “HR 2 : Repeal the Job Killing Health Care Law Act” and “HR 3: No Taxpayer Money for Abortion Act” ; I say kudos to an effort such as this in regards to being transparent in the laws being presented to the House and the fact that the bill details exactly what is contained inside. These bills are short and concise, and should be. The general public should be able to easily read and understand the rules and regulations that directly affect their lives in addition to being informed on how their tax money is spent. The years of passing laws that increase the wealth of a few including foreign nations that are against American Interests is over. I truly hope that you and your office plans on standing up for American values and American Interests. If you need ideas for future regulation reform I have House Resolution for you:
{HR : Internet Service Provider Definition Act
This Act will provide the definition of an Internet Service Provider and will be substituted in all Public Laws, Rules, and Regulations which contain the prior definitions in place before this Act is deemed law. An Internet Service Provider is an organization that grants a connection to the Internet. An Internet Service Provider is bound to the Communications Act of 1934 due to the fact that it provides a signal of light or an electric pulse over a wire. The equipment owned by the Internet Service Provider to provide this service must be configured to allow the maximum bandwidth available without any type of restriction. Even though a Megabyte equals 1024 bits, 1MB = 1MB, and the sale of throughput that is not available at a constant rate for an end user is considered fraud and will be punishable by law. Only by an Act of Congress may the wires of Internet Service Providers be monitored. }
This is simple, straightforward, and to the point. It would also be a stand for the Freedoms found under the First Amendment, in which Speech has turned into a form of Communication that should not be hindered. The examples that are provided by the Protests of Egypt 2011, in which the Egyptian Government shutoff Internet Service for the General Public should not be repeated in the United Sates. Companies should be responsible for their own networks and the Internet Service Providers today were yesterday’s Bell Companies which had to have rules to operate under. Their pockets are their bottom line and there is no interest in providing the American people with the fastest service available. In the National Broadband Plan there are many goals that need to be achieved that fully depend on the willingness for Private Companies to spend money upgrading their infrastructure. Steps need to be made to ensure the Public receives promised goods and services. The North Carolina General Assembly is going to redraw the lines this year. I believe we get two extra Congressman from the Census results, any word on this? Have a good year!
Kind Regards,
Paul Michael Owens
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
ACLU protects Terrorists

This guy is on the US "Kill List", he also is an American Citizen born in New Mexico. Anwar al-Awlaki is an instigator. He encouraged the Fort Hood Shooter and the Christmas Day bomber. His goal is to cause terror in the United States. The ACLU thinks this guy needs a defense. What's wrong with the ACLU.... everything. Maybe they should be funding a reward for this guy's death instead.
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




