There is no defense for this statement. He stated it was a negative document because it told what the government could not do to the people. But it did not tell what the government COULD do for the people. Even though Mr. Obama is a lawyer and a professor. I think he missed the grasp of what the Constitution really means. I think he missed what the Constitution stands for.
There is no defense for calling the Constitution a negative document. It is wrong. The Constitution is one of the most creative, POSITIVE documents ever crafted in the history of man. The Constitution must be a negative document to Mr. Obama because it must hold him back from his wishes and dreams. It must affect Mr. Obama in a negative way. Perhaps it negatively affects the direction that Mr. Obama wishes to take this country. The only person who this negatively affects is a person who does not care for the rights given to people.
The fact that Mr. Obama claims this great document as negative shows what kind of person he truly is. I am saddened that no one is really talking about it, other than Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report, but of course this does not get to the mainstream media. It's unfortunate that people do not care that our Constitution is continued to be trampled on, and will further be trampled on with the Despotism of a Democrat ruled Government.
I will just remind everyone, that the Declaration of Independence can be reenvoked for a reassertion of Liberty.
George Washington warned us about the party system, and his farewell address seems to be coming to life.
No comments:
Post a Comment