Quotes to live by:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." -Declaration of Independence

"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." -MLK, Jr.

Liberty's Watch

Liberty's Watch
9/11 Truth!! Never Forget!

Internet Defense League

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

DTTNWO ... Death to the New World Order

This may be the rally cry for the cyber revolution for the Death of the New World Order. Bush Sr introduced us to this term, New World Order, speaking in Congress in the early 90s. Think what you want that a "New World Order" might not be true, but you should never let anything surprise you. But throughout 2008, this term has popped up in global terms with presidents of other Countries (France for example) demanding a new world order, and a global economic order. In an attempt to do some investigating on the subject, there is some validity to a claim of New World Order.  How about the super rich financiers meeting on a regular basis, yearly,  to discuss the happenings of the globe. Thinking about it the 125 people who attend these meetings probably don't rule the world. The Bildebergs are a real entity and can be looked up, but I believe they are all just diplomats. It has to be a much smaller number if not infact a singular digit. And it definitely must be a secret. I had to figure out what the DTTNWO stood for because I kept seeing it in posts on Alex Jones' www.infowars.com website, and I believe that Death to the New World Order is what it stands for. A one world government is not a good idea simply because to give true freedoms, people must decide for themselves what is a good idea or not, or what direction you general area should go. Someone 10000 miles around the world is not going to make that decision for me. But they already are...

If you have come this far, take two hours to watch EndGame, by Alex Jones. He does a good job explaining a lot of things.

2008 Economic Bailout of Private Corporations SmokeScreen

One of the biggest items of business for the legislative branch to handle is the attempt of the executive branch to forcefully take over spending. If you actually have read the Bill, HR 3997, you will see that what this bill really does is give a lot of power for the Secretary of the Treasury to SPEND YOUR TAX MONEY. Read the bill, it will enlighten you on the true nature of this administration that Congress still refuses to Impeach. The power to Tax and Spend is a sole power given to the legislative branch by the United States Constitution. This is why Bush is so adimate into getting this bill passed into law so quickly, before the real story comes out. Government money should never be used to "Prop up the Market".  There is nothing but propaganda out there. People are upset that they cannot get loans to "buy things" anymore. They cannot upgrade their car, they cannot upgrade their house, they cannot upgrade their TV! This is an outrage! Please take the sarcasm with a grain of salt. We have to get OUR government under control, you must contact your Congressman and let them know it is not their job to protect bad businesses. It is also their job to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States. Giving the Executive Branch Spending Power should never happen. Don't let the facade of an economic crisis blind you. They keep stating that the market will correct itself, just hold on for the bumpy ride, there actually has been lots of money MAKING going on. This bill is more important than a weak attempt of bailing out private corporations for their overspeculation and improper management of funds. It would be VERY improper to give the Executive Spending Privaledges, and any they have appropriated themselves already, its time to reel in. I am more surprised about the Political Science majors aren't speaking up like Economic majors are, stating they wished more people understood economics more. People you need to know your politics more!

No BailOut! Let them Fail! Is the trivial debate conducting a smokescreen for the real issue of more Constitutional Violations being proported by the Administration in the Executive Branch currently. Impeaching Bush and Cheney leaves us with a tediuos job of Impeaching Nancy Peloski. In the order of replacement, she is third. Then do we keep impeaching until we get our next president? That would be an interesting end to a criminal campaign by the elite to create a New World Order.

9/11 was an Inside job...DTTNWO

2008 First Presidential Debate without all Parties

Another farce for a Presidential Debate:


First of all this debate did not include all parties running for President. The attitude is that only two parties count, when both these parties only want more tax money from you to spend it on their desires. There is no fiscal responsibility with any party. All parties running for President should be allowed to participate in the debate.

 

The Economic Question was posed to both candidates: 

Obama is still whitewashing the economic situation. Government protectionism is his MO. It's my job as a government official to take part in your life is the opinion of Obama. Mccain definitely proports the one party government by reiterating that Republicans and Democrats are working together. They work so much together, where is the difference? He also thinks our economy will be fixed if we stop dependance of foreign oil. Obama thinks that intervention is inevitable, which of course would go along with the government in every aspect of your life. Regulations have just fell through the cracks and are not 21st century is the main reason we are in this economic crisis according to Obama. 

Soon the government will require you to hand over your check, they will glean it for anything that they wish to do, and give you the rest. You'll be ok with that... right?

Jim Leher wants to be Oprah and have these candidates sit on a couch and talk with each other. This is a debate not a talk show.


 McCain just believes in just the fundamental belief that America is the greatest country and has the strongest workforce. McCain wants to veto every spending bill if President. 17.2 Billion dollars in earmarks for the fiscal year of 2008. I got that fact from www.cagw.org . According to Obama, Mccain will give a 300 Billion dollar in Tax Cut for the rich. Obama will have a Tax cut for 95% of Americans. According to McCain there were 932 Million dollars in requests by Obama. Obama has on his Senate Website the items he earmarked, and I stopped counting at 150 million and I wasn't even halfway through. McCain also said that there will be 800 Billion dollars in new spending with Obama. Well Congress has already authorized 600 Billion in spending, and lets just wait for the bailout.  Obama states he will close corporate loopholes and fix the broken Health Care system. This Debate is remaining civil. Obama wants to focus on getting the middle class back on track. McCain states there is a 35% Business Tax currently happening and thats why businesses are going overseas. McCain also wants to give a $5000 refundable tax credit. Obama states that if you make less than $250,000 you will not be taxed. He wants to create the structure for a global market. Join the New World Order with Obama. Cutting spending and fixed cost contracts is what McCain is proposing. 15 Billion dollars are given to private insurers. "I love my hands", both candidates love using their hands for anything. There will be a spending freeze because there are 700 billion dollars a year spent overseas says McCain.


Jim Leher only wants to talk about the economy for the first 30 minutes.

McCain says, "No federal government health care." McCain wants to spend your money in other ways, by "adjusting the spending". Going back to the one party government, the spend party. Democrats want to spend on social programs, the Republicans want to spend on "other things". 


The debate turns to the war in Iraq, and war in general. McCain slams Obama on his inexperience on war. Obama states clearly his position on Pakistan. Obama is left handed. The Presidential Candidates are bracelet wearers. Has Obama visited the war zones?Yes he has. 

The Iranian threat , McCain states they are a threat to israel and the region and he doesn't want a second holocaust. He wants a league of democracies in the Middle East. Iran also puts advanced IEDs in Iraq killing our troops. Russia is not helping with the situation with Iran. Obama states the War in Iraq is strengthening Iran and we are a stalwart(strong) ally with israel. We need Russia and China to partcipate, and wants direct talks with Iran without preconditions. Mccain lefthanded. Kissenger states there should be talks without preconditions. But I really don't like Kissinger, he would rather everyone be his butler. In a statement about Russia, Obama states "the fight for Democracy is on". McCain misleading about what happened in Georgia, goto different newsites to gather your own opinion about what happened in South Ossetia. To me it seems like the Russian Peacekeepers were attacked, and Russia has a right to defend its soldiers.  Will there be a 9/11 type of attack again???? McCain says we have a safer nation since 9/11, almost all the 40 ideas that were submitted by the lying cheating 9/11 commision have been done since 9/11. Obama says that there is not enough being done to protect our transit and chemical plants. The biggest threat is nuclear weapons in a suitcase. AL Qeada is in 60 countries. The Root cause for fever for Al-Qeada is in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Obama would like to improve the way we are perceived globally and restore American standards. China is spreading their interests while we are focused on Iraq. Obama's dad was from Kenya, and had a high respect for the US and now the US standing in the world has fallen, and Obama wishes to restore it. McCain was in prison, and when he came back he worked to get everyone home by normalizing relationships with the countries we attacked.


I think this debate gave you small clues on what these guys will really do. NOTHING.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

House Judiciary Committee's hearing with FBI Director Muller

I was very impressed when I watched this hearing. Congressman Conyers rips the Director a new one, and rightly so. I'm happy to see that our Representatives are working hard in the favor of the American People. Director Muller did his best to avoid answering direct questions, and was disappointed when hearing he could barely remember the 4th Amendment. The video is still on the main page at CSPAN.ORG. But it looks like finally Congress is beginning to represent the people and ask the FBI the tough questions. It was about 2 hours of information galore. An interesting note is that in California there is a push to challenge people in their current address, and compare them to forclosure listings. Police State at the polls? What is this... Israel?

Monday, September 15, 2008

Movie Review : Hotel Rwanda

If you want to take a look at apartied from the inside, and can handle seeing what is currently going on in Africa, watch this movie. A poweful movie that should draw out every emotion to appeal to your sense that you can help anyone in true dire need. We should stop fighting for oil and start fighting for the civilization of the population. Can you handle the truth?

Movie Review: The Godfather

Don't we all want to be Vito Corleone? Ok, maybe not everyone, but this movie sure does make it look enticing. Great acting, great script, I'm definitely a fan of the 20s-40s era, and this movie helps bring life to the times. Watch the whole set, but definitely don't miss at least the Original.

2009 Tour de France : Lance is back!

Well it's all over for all the other contenders, because I believe Lance Armstrong is going to win every time he rides, an even number like 10 wins would be something even to finish on. 

Congrats to Carlos Sastre for his Win of the 2008 Tour de France.


Visit here for more information: http://www.letour.fr/indexus.html

2008 Chase Race 1 - GO#88

Loudon, Chase Race 1. Junior has a great car, and leads 79 laps,  until a bad set of tires during the middle of the race. A Top 5 brings him within 50 points of 1st Place in the Championship Hunt. Congratulations to Greg Biffle and the #16 Team with the win at New Hampshire!

Sunday, September 14, 2008

WRAL Channel 5 is going to Interview Joe Biden: Requested Questions, My Question

Joe Biden stated, "If elected he would pursue charges against the Bush administration." Why does it matter if he is elected or not? If he feels that Bush has done something that warrants pursuing charges then after the election, would he not be guilty now? I think it is rather childish of the Vice Presidential Democratic Candidate, to add a "pork" to his election. If he was as stand-up Senator, he would be pushing congress for an Impeachment Inquiry. It would be more effective to have an impeachment process before the Standing President is out of Office. Bush is guilty of Treason, and should be held accountable for his actions. If you agree with only one of the 35 Articles in Congressman Kucinich's Articles of Impeachments, then Bush should be impeached. So to sum up, I would like the Senator to answer the following question: Why do we have to wait for you to get elected to have the process started for there to be charges brought up against the President?

Thursday, September 11, 2008

9/11

We must remember this specific event. This event changed everyones lives. There are over 50,000 first responders that are sick and dying because of the lies told by the EPA that the air was safe to breath, and yet the government does nothing about it. What other lies were told? No one will TELL. Obviously there was a media coverup and manipulation, as well as a government coverup and manipulation. I believe Israel was involved somehow, and that we will not know for sure until further in the future. I am glad that Luke and Alex are here to help spread the Truth. The cause is worth it.

Remember everyone involved in 9/11/2001.

Have you forgotten?

Inside the Twin Towers: Discovery Special

If you pay attention to this special, you will witness the propoganda placed in this movie. The biggest propoganda is the fact that they are putting words into a person mouth who passed away during this tradegy. Victor says during this special, that "Al Queada did it, they are terrorists", now during this whole tradegy, one who didn't make it makes a statement that would have been a miracle ephiphany around no one who makes it through the collapse, because these people did not know what really happened. There are also one or two incongruencies in the movie as well. Including the statement that 36 of the 47 inner core columns are severed during the impact of the planes, which this is not the case. Also the manager of the Windows to the World made it down, when it is claimed that there was no way down during the impact of the plane. It is very sad to me that Discovery has become involved in this effort to proport propoganda about the 9-11 tradegies. I am in complete disgust of this special by Discovery Channel, and hope that someone will post very inclusive information opposing the items discussed in this special. You can even look at the testimony of the people who survived, and really feel the compassion that was given by them.  It is too much to think about. The pancake theory is not valid.


Sunday, September 7, 2008

Congress's Secret Meeting about FISA - March 13,2008

I definitely have a problem with secret meetings. My problem with THIS secret meeting, is the fact that it DID take place almost 6 months ago. Only finding out about it now is a disgrace to the mainstream media, although they did have some meetings about it. Dennis Kucinich is the one of the few Congressmen who will stand up for the common man. I did find a video on this in the Alex Jones' Infowars.com website, but it was latent with religious propoganda. This was the first I saw it. I went to CSPAN Archives, and found the video. March 13, 2008 it was aired. This is something you should watch.

Here's how you do it.


Click on the watch the flash video now. Move the Cursor to 7:30:00, and watch what progresses, this is a very interesting debate.

After an hour and half of debate, it was obvious that Congressman Ray Blount had some information that he wished to share with the members of congress that would be applicable to the passage of the FISA bill. There was much discussion about whether the information had been given to the Intelligence committee. This information that Congressman Blount had was already available to that committee, but not readily available to the members of congress. Now the one thing that I wish we as the public could know, is that what information was it. I mean there is not information that is necessarily that seceret. Other than Bush admitted to silverstein that he knew the towers were controlled demolitions, or the specific location of Osama Bin Ladin. I mean the only reason we should keep information secret is something like we're on your border and we are getting ready to get you. Perhaps this is the reason for the incursions into Pakistan. I mean wouldn't it be lovely if Bush captured Bin Laden before he finished his Presidency. It would be lovely for Bush. Finish on a good PR note. But that's all it would be. 

PR ..... Public Relations.

9-11 was an Inside Job. Believe it, because it is true.

Friday, September 5, 2008

Post on Infowars.com, In response to an article about Legislative Branch wanting to rachet up pressure on Iran

Post #74 wanted to know what the Bill #s were, because the author of the following article http://www.infowars.com/?p=4334#comment-531910 was not specific.

My Post was as follows:




In response to post #74. I spent some time researching http://thomas.loc.gov , a place where you can lookup bills that congress and the senate propose and are proposing, I found the actual bills the author of this article is referring to. Obviously #74 is intelligent like myself, and wishes to verify information before jumping on the bandwagon.
Here is your information: 
S.RES.580 Title: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability. Sponsor: Sen Bayh, Evan [IN] (introduced 6/2/2008) Cosponsors (49) Related Bills: H.CON.RES.362 Latest Major Action: 6/2/2008 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. 

H.CON.RES.362 Title: Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed to international peace, stability in the Middle East, and the vital national security interests of the United States by Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons and regional hegemony, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Ackerman, Gary L. [NY-5] (introduced 5/22/2008) Cosponsors (261) Related Bills: S.RES.580 Latest Major Action: 5/22/2008 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.  

Both of these Bills are in committee, and I have checked both committees websites, neither have these bills scheduled for review. SO, they are out there and valid. But what does this mean? I agree that Iran should not have the capability for making Nuclear Weapons, but they should have the capability to provide for their own economic energy policies with a nuclear source. I think all countries should have Nuclear Transparency including the US. Iran is definitely not complying with the IAEA, and all the necessary items it needs to review, and they must comply. 

I wish to reiterate to people that Israel is a STATE, not a religion. Israel is currently occupying territory that is not theirs, you should look at the facts of the Palestinian struggle, and the methods that Israel has taken to maintain their superiority over the Palestinian people. The use of overwhelming force and treating people as lesser human beings should not be tolerated in today's world.

NASCAR: Chase Prediction - NASCAR Champion

This year has been a great year for racing. The introduction of a wonderful CAR who has been a handful for teams to manage has created an estatic race environment. I truly believe that Dale Earnhardt Jr will emerge as a Champion this season. This is based on his performance this year as a driver, sitting in the Top 5 in the points almost the entire season, but everyone has downplayed Mr. Earnhardt this year.  I feel that Dale Jr is a champion on the Cup level, and he will eventually show that this is his caliber. I think this is his year. There are several tracks during the chase that he has won at, and now he has the equipment to show his true talent at driving. Look at the last race, where he finished 11th, and had an out of control car. Of course the last race at Fontana was the "Jimmie Johnson" Show, but remember Junior is a part of that team.  I am proud to have a front lisence plate and a rear-right window sticker to show my support for Junior, and hope one day to meet the gentleman from North Carolina, because he is one of the reasons that North Carolina will remain great in its status as a State, even though it may not be the most populous.

Congratulations to Dale Jr for clinching a spot in the chase, and I can't wait to feeeeeeeeeeeel the celebration of a champion!

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Letter to Congressman Price about the Institute for Homeland Security Solutions :Copied Congressman Brad Miller

Congressman Price,

Thank you for wasting more of the taxpayer's money for a new Institute for Homeland Security. 
As a taxpayer, i'm glad that you are so good at wasting money by creating new federal institute 
that is redudant. It is very dissappointing to me that we have to have a whole building with 
employees to come up with solutions for an overly redundant Agency, Homeland Security, that is totally unneccessary. I am glad that you are for a new bureaucracy, and continue to create 
complexity in government. Cannot Homeland Security come up with its own solutions? Do we not have competant people in this Agency? This is just another example on how people in government just wish to make government bigger. Government is too big as it is. I would rather have a check sent to me for 2 cents, and to have confidence in my government that instead of saying, hey we can spend this money, saying hey we can give this money back to the people because we didn't use it. Creating bureaucracies under the guise of homeland security is a fallacy that you are exuding. What about our National Guard? What about the FBI? What about the CIA? Instead of creating another redundant agency, you should have been working to get these agencies to work together. We the people do know that they are OUR agencies, and they must do what WE say. They work for us, the people, mainly because we pay them with OUR tax money. It is truly dissappointing to continue to read about wasteful spending that our government continues to impose on it's people. And even though I am not in your district, I am sad that a North Carolina representative is helping with the growth of big government.

Sincerely,

Paul Michael Owens